Memorability of line drawings of scenes: the role of contour properties.

Why are some images more likely to be remembered than others? Previous work focused on the influence of global, low-level visual features as well as image content on memorability. To better understand the role of local, shape-based contours, we here investigate the memorability of photographs and line drawings of scenes. We find that the memorability of photographs and line drawings of the same scenes is correlated. We quantitatively measure the role of contour properties and their spatial relationships for scene memorability using a Random Forest analysis. To determine whether this relationship is merely correlational or if manipulating these contour properties causes images to be remembered better or worse, we split each line drawing into two half-images, one with high and the other with low predicted memorability according to the trained Random Forest model. In a new memorability experiment, we find that the half-images predicted to be more memorable were indeed remembered better, confirming a causal role of shape-based contour features, and, in particular, T junctions in scene memorability. We performed a categorization experiment on half-images to test for differential access to scene content. We found that half-images predicted to be more memorable were categorized more accurately. However, categorization accuracy for individual images was not correlated with their memorability. These results demonstrate that we can measure the contributions of individual contour properties to scene memorability and verify their causal involvement with targeted image manipulations, thereby bridging the gap between low-level features and scene semantics in our understanding of memorability.

Simple action planning can affect attentional allocation in subsequent visual search.

Previous research has shown that mental representations of actions can influence performance on relevant tasks or dimensions even when there is no overt execution of the action. In this study, we examined whether cognitive processes prior to the physical execution of an action can elicit attentional bias towards irrelevant tasks or dimensions of that action. Participants performed two independent tasks-an action task and a search task-where they were instructed to plan an action and execute the action following the visual search task. We found that the same features of the object were prioritized in the subsequent search task when participants had planned an action response on the object in comparison to when they had not. This effect occurred even when the feature was irrelevant to the tasks or required action. Furthermore, the effect of action planning without physical response was found to be comparable to the effect of physical response. These results suggest that planning of a simple action can induce attentional bias to irrelevant features of objects even without physical action.